It's
possible to explain the essential elements of the model in just 10-15
minutes. Usually, it is advisable to move right into examples and practical
workshop exercises without a great deal of conceptual discussion. Once
the participants begin to assimilate the model and its implications, the
workshop leader can return to the conceptual discussion and extend the
discussion to various related topics.
How valid and reliable is the SI Profile as a measurement tool?
In
evaluating measurement tools like the SI Profile, it is important to understand
the implications of the terms validity and reliability. To say that an
instrument is valid means that it measures what its designers or users
claim that it measures. To say that it is reliable means that it gives
similar or identical results when it is applied more than once under the
same circumstances.
Because
the SI Profile is based on a unique conceptual model, it cannot be validated
against any known objective standard; therefore, the appropriate measure
is what is known as "face validity," i.e. the extent to which
it makes sense "on its face." Face validity is determined by
asking a number of people who have taken the instrument "How well
do you believe your profile scores accurately describe your social skills
and interaction patterns?"
Reliability is a somewhat more complex issue, because the theoretical
proposition behind the SI Profile supposes that a person's social skills
and interaction style are not fixed for all time. Although most people
tend to keep approximately the same overall interaction pattern, particularly
in terms of the comparative levels of the four primary dimensions, many
people report that their profiles may shift over time. With regard to
social skills, obviously the objective of the SIP is to help people improve
their skills over time. For that reason, the best measure of validity
and reliability for the SIP would be the extent to which people feel it
is instrumental in helping them intreract with others more successfully.
How
can we be sure that a person will answer the questions on the profile
honestly and realistically?
We
can't. Every self-assessment instrument ultimately depends on the willingness
of the person filling it out to answer the questions honestly and realistically.
This is why instruments like the SIP and others work best when administered
by an experienced and trained professional practitioner, who can guide
and encourage people to approach the experience constructively and interpret
their scores realistically.
The
instruction page of the profile cautions the user to think carefully about
each question, and to "answer as if someone who knows you very well
is looking over your shoulder." Practitioners who use the SIP in
their work should emphasize to their clients the value of realistic answers
for their own self-understanding and personal development.
Is SIP a transcultural model?
We believe that the five key dimensions of social skill - Situational Awareness,
Presence, Authenticity, Clarity and Empathy (the "S.P.A.C.E."
formula) may be durable across cultures. However, the specific expression
of those skills, as well as accepted behaviors associated with those skills,
will certainly vary from one culture to another. In some cultures, for
example, openness, candor, and even confrontation are valued; in others,
they may be perceived as aggressive and destructive. Further, norms for
various kinds of behaviors will certainly vary even within one culture.
We
also believe that the SIP's interaction style model - Social Energy and
Results Focus - may be durable across cultures. Again, however, it is
reasonable to consider that specific behavioral options may be favored
over others in a particular culture, even though the conceptual framework
of the interaction styles may be portable.
The
SIP, having originated in a Western, European-oriented business environment,
and having been designed primarly for adults in a business setting, inevitably
reflects the social viewpoints, values and norms of the West. We make
no claims that it might be universal in its constructs, its applicability,
or its usefulness.
Users
of the SIP must ultimately accept responsibility for the choices they
make in using the instrument with various populations, and in particular
they need to think carefully about how to interpret the results and explain
the basic concepts to people with diverse cultural experiences.
Is there a statistical data base of SI profiles?
Not
yet. SIP is a new product, and we will soon begin the process of gathering profiles
for a comparative database. As this database accumulates, we will make
the results available to Registered Professional Users at the appropriate
time.
Is
SIP available in other languages besides English?
Not at this time.
Is
there an online version of SIP?
We are planning to offer an online version in the near future. If you're
interested, send us an email message
asking to be notified when it is operational.
It
seems like SIP would be ideally suited for a 360-degree, or multi-rater
application. Do you plan to offer a version that allows people to get
feedback from others?
Depending
on the demand, we will probably introduce a multi-rater version, available
only to Registered Professional Users. As we foresee it, the professional
practitioner will be able to issue passwords to individuals he or she
is working with, and they as well as their selected raters will go to
the website and fill out the SIP questionnaire, each giving his or her
perceptions of the person being rated. The practitioner will be able to
access the data for the specific individual, and generate online reports
of comparative perceptions.
We
have not set a target date for the availability of the multi-rater version.
How does a professional user get started using the SIP?
Just submit your online application form for registration as a Professional User (we will charge your credit card for the $35 cost of the profile, plus a $5 handling / registration fee.)
You'll find that you can readily understand the model and the
conceptual background, and you'll begin to see the implications of the
model for your training or counseling activities.
Try
including a module on the SIP in one of your workshops. Allow about 25
minutes for administering and scoring the profiles, 20 minutes or so to
explain and discuss the model and participant profiles, and perhaps 30-60
minutes for an exercise to help participants experience the effects of
social intelligence and interaction styles.
After you've used the SIP a few times, you'll find yourself thinking of
new ways to apply it: personal skills training, supervisor-employee counseling,
team building, sales training, coaching, counseling, conflict resolution
and a host of other possibilities.
KAI Home